Country-wise Applications Rejection Report


Selected Country Name:

SRI LANKA

S.No. Publish date on Portal Point of Entry Product Name Manufacturer Importer Details Reason of Rejection View App.
1 2018-11-12 TUTICORIN ARECA NUTS CENTRAL TRADERS,NO.25B, CENTRAL ROAD,COLOMBO-12 ROYAL IMPORTS AND EXPORTS,XII/1517N, WAGAMON ROAD, NADACKAL,ERATTUPETTA,KERALA REJECTED Under Sec 25(1)(i) of FSSAct,2006 as the sample did not conform to the standards laid down under Regulation 2.3.55 of FSS(Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations,2011 in that the "Damaged by mould & Insect and Total Plate Count" exceeded the maximum permissible limit View
2 2018-11-05 TUTICORIN ARECA NUTS CENTRAL TRADERS,NO.25B, CENTRAL ROAD,COLOMBO-12 ARIHANT GROUPS,NO.8,23RD CROSS,CUBBONPET,BENGALORE. REJECTED under Sec 25(1)(i) since the sample did not conform to the standards laid down under Regulation 2.3.55 of FSS(Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations,2011 in that "Damaged by mould and insects" and Total Aflatoxin exceeded the maximum permissible limit View
3 2018-11-28 TUTICORIN ARECA NUTS CENTRAL SPICE EXPORT,NO.27E,TB,PANABOKKE MAWATHA,GOMPOLA,SRI LANKA A Y TRADERS, 14/357 A-5,ERATTUPETTA-2,KOTTYAYAM DISTRICT,KERALA-686122 REJECTED u/s 25(1)(i) of FSSAct,2006 since the sample did not conform to the standards laid down under 2.3.55 of FSS(Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations,2011 in that the Total Plate Count exceeded the maximum permissible limit View
4 2018-12-04 TUTICORIN MACE Well Spice & Car Sale,No.153/A/1 A-9, Road,Kurundugaha ELA,Akurana,SriLanka G.T.Spices,539,Dhesapandu street,Cape Road,Kottar,Nagercoil,KK Dist,TamilNadu REJECTED U/Sec 25(1)(i) of FSSAct,2006 since the sample did not conform to the standards laid down under Regulation 2.9.12 (1) of FSS(FPS&FA)Regulations,2011 in that found Mould and Moisture parameter exceeded the maximum permissible limit View
5 2018-10-24 Chennai Port ARECANUTS MSM SPICY EXPORTS (PVT) LTD UNIK TRADERS As per the Referral Lab analysis,the sample does not conform to the standards laid down for Arecanut under the provisions of Food Safety and Standards (Food Product Standards & Food Additives) Regulations,2011 thereof, in that a) Sample was not free from insect infested nuts,musty odour & mould growth b) Moisture content exceeds the maximum permissible limit c) Damaged by moulds and insects exceeds the maximum permissible limit and d) View
6 2018-11-05 Chennai Port ARECANUTS GARUDA INVESTMENT PVT LTD UNIK TRADERS As per the Referral Lab analysis report,the sample does not conform to the standards laid down for Arecanut under the provisions of Food Safety and Standards (Food Product Standards & Food Additives) Regulations,2011 thereof, in that a) Sample was not free from damaged nuts & mould growth b) Moisture content exceeds the maximum permissible limit c) Damaged Nuts exceeds the maximum permissible limit d) Damaged by moulds and insects exceeds t View
7 2018-11-02 Chennai Port ARECANUTS SENURA INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD UNIK TRADERS As per the Referral Lab analysis report,the sample does not conform to the standards laid down for Arecanut under the provisions of Food Safety and Standards (Food Product Standards & Food Additives) Regulations,2011 thereof, in that a) Sample was not free from insect infested nuts,musty odour & mould growth b) Moisture content exceeds the maximum permissible limit c) Damaged by moulds and insects exceeds the maximum permissible limit and d)Aflatoxin content exceeds the maximum permissible limit View
8 2018-11-01 Chennai Port ARECANUTS CENTRAL TRADERS UNIK TRADERS As per the Referral Lab analysis report,the sample does not conform to the standards laid down for Arecanut under the provisions of Food Safety and Standards (Food Product Standards & Food Additives) Regulations,2011 thereof, in that a) Sample was not free from insect infested nuts,musty odour & mould growth b)Moisture content exceeds the maximum permissible limit c) Damaged by moulds and insects exceeds the maximum permissible limit and d) Aflatoxin content exceeds the maximum permissible limit View
9 2018-10-24 Chennai Port ARECANUTS CHAMATHKAR HOLDINGS PVT LTD UNIK TRADERS As per the Referral Lab analysis report,the sample does not conform to the standards laid down for Arecanut under the provisions of Food Safety and Standards (Food Product Standards & Food Additives) Regulations,2011 thereof, in that a) Sample was not free from insect infested nuts,musty odour & mould growth b) Moisture content exceeds the maximum permissible limit c) Damaged by moulds and insects exceeds the maximum permissible limit and d)Aflatoxin content exceeds the maximum permissible limit View
10 2018-11-07 Chennai Port CLOVES RATHNA PRODUCERS CINNAMON EXPORTS PVT LTD EASTERN CONDIMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED Does not confirm to the standards laid down under Regulation no.2.9.6(1) of the Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards & Food Additives) Regulations 2011 thereof in that; Headless cloves exceeds the maximum permissible limit View
11 2018-10-24 Chennai Port SRILANKAN BLACK PEPPER AGROPRIME KAVERI GLOBAL Does not conform to the standards laid down under 2.9.15 (1) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 2011 thereof in that; Not free from Mould & musty odour present View
12 2017-09-20 NHAVA SHEVA NA RM HOLDING NO: 377 GALLE ROAD COLOMBO 03 SRILANKA MOONLIFE MERCANTILE PRIVATE LIMITED Moisture, Damaged Nuts , Damaged nuts by Moulds and Insects View